| | |           Rss   
 
 
 

Follow Us:

Archive >> October 15 2009   Get FREE Newsletter    
LATEST ISSUE

 

PREVIOUS ISSUES

VIDEOS
 
WHITEPAPERS
» IP Voice trading System
» Dealer Desk of the Future
» Top 10 Security Risks
» How Green is your IT?

                    More
 
ADVERTISEMENT




 
 Opinion

 Key to Real Customer Satisfaction

 Robert FaletraBy Robert Faletra

It seems to me that Microsoft is taking the wrong approach to force its partners into taking customer satisfaction survey. In case VARs haven't heard, Microsoft will force all who want to achieve or maintain Gold level status, to participate in its customer satisfaction index study.

I'm not against VARs getting an understanding of customer satisfaction levels. In fact, I believe they should do more to understand customers and their perception. But the trouble with Microsoft's approach is that it's highly unlikaely to return much usable data. What Microsoft should be surveying for is the total customer experience through its partners when its products are included in a solution.

Let me use myself as a far-too-simple hypothetical example but one that will illustrate my point.

I personally own a Lenovo Reserve Edition laptop. It's a wonderful machine with wonderful support. Trouble is, the operating system is Microsoft Vista. If I were to be surveyed as to my satisfaction with the reseller I obtained the machine from, it would score highly. Ask me about the hardware and I also would be raving. If I were to be surveyed about the total customer experience with this product, however, it would result in much lower satisfaction numbers. Those numbers would be dragged down exclusively because of Vista. So my total customer experience here is abysmal because of a single element that makes up the total experience—that's important to note.

I'm not arguing that it isn't important to understand how solution providers perform in the market. In fact, if a VAR consistently falls short any vendor ought to think about the value in working with that partner. If all Microsoft is trying to accomplish is development of a system that will weed out partners, then perhaps it should proceed.

But if what it really wants to do is understand what is happening in the market when a Microsoft product is baked into a solution—and how it can be sure that all the gears that must mesh to result in a great customer experience are well-oiled—then I think it needs to look at this a bit differently.
So here are a few suggestions: First, Microsoft needs to state clearly what it wants to accomplish over the long term. If that is to determine which portions of its partner base are poor performers, what they can do to improve their customer satisfaction levels, then it should develop an ongoing system that regularly surveys customer satisfaction of these VARs.

But if what it really wants to do is determine the entire engagement and experience a customer feels then it needs to go after the total customer experience. That will also give it some benchmark data it can use for comparison as we move further along the path to cloud computing.

  Print this Page   E-mail this Page
Comment:*
First Name:*
Last Name:*
Company:
City:*
E-mail:*
Verification Code:*

Type the characters you see in the picture above.
 
    Reset
Comments
11/6/2009 5:19:40 AM
 
Request of free software driver for sahara laptop
 
 - Tigist G/yohannis,civil servant at governmental institution,Ethiopia
1
 
MOST POPULAR
 
MOST DISCUSSED
 
EDITOR'S BLOG

Learnings from 2010

The year 2010 witnessed major shifts in the IT landscape, driven by considerable changes in customer behavior and new concepts such as cloud computing and unified computing taking center-stage

NEW PRODUCTS

Epson AIO inkjet printers

Epson recently announced the launch of an entry-level all-in-one (AIO) printer—Stylus TX121—and a mainstream AIO printer—Stylus TX220

POLL
Has payment defaults increased among your channels?


 View Polls Archive
 
CRN SPECIAL

Channel Champions 2009

Outlook 2010

Outlook 2012

ADVERTISEMENT